Are orcs inherently evil? Should they be?

I originally wrote most of this as a reply on Martin Kallies' entry on "Old School Orcs and Horrible Hordes" over on Spriggan's Den. But I have never been able to actually enter a comment there as all browsers on all devices give a "ERROR: JavaScript and Cookies are required in order to post a comment" and he has no contact details to report it. So I hope he sees this, both for the comment and the error report. So I would suggest to go read that first for context and then come back.


It's a complicated thing.

On one hand, I am absolutely fine with certain fantasy species being inherently evil - or violent, destructive and rampaging. And yes, persist over many generations in this manner.

On the other hand, I think you nail what is essentially the issue here in your third paragraph (and which a lot of old schoolers miss in their haste to allow that of course orcs can be inherently evil) - It is not so much about whether we have to have all our fantasy creations be well-rounded morally complex beings, essentially just like us. 

But rather - Is there a point to having a fantasy stage for playing out the trope of "kill the savage foreigners that encroach on our lands - What? Yes *of course* they are evil. It's in their blood."

My first thought is: Not really. It seems like a somewhat distasteful dynamic in the present day. Although, there could be I suppose. It seems like this was perhaps a more relevant trope to play out when WWII and the nazis were closer to historical consciousness than it is today, where post-colonial tension and systemic racism is far more in the foreground of our cultural consciousness than the nazis. Orcs don't seem out of place in Tolkien's Middle Earth.

Nonetheless, I do think in general, there is a point to fantasy playing out parts of human behaviour that have been washed out of modern society and/or aren't relevant or appropriate to modern society. For me, fantasy rpg is not just a platform for enacting modern themes with elves and magic wands. There are some who play Dark Sun and can't help but turn it into a campaign of fighting slavery and saving the environment. For me, Dark Sun campaigns is about playing in a world where both slavery and the dying earth themes have been mostly internalised as facts of life and how one gets by in such a world.

Most sword & sorcery settings place a very different value on a human life than we do in modern society, even from its protagonists. That too is a kind of morality I find interesting to explore in a fantasy context, even though I find it reprehensible in real life. 

Something I find quite interesting about human history are the examples of cultural consciousness that seems so strange to me today so as to be almost alien: 

  • The aztecs had the most gory of human sacrifice rituals to keep the sun revolving and prevent the world's end. 
  • In medieval times, oaths were so culturally strong, whole society and law codes could be written around them. 
  • In the 1970s, Khmer Rouge emptied the cities and towns of cambodia and killed people with glasses for showing signs of literacy in a fanatic "return to the roots" movements. 
  • For thousands of years, the pharaos of Egypt constructed enormous pyramids as launch platforms to the afterlife for themselves.
  • For over four centuries, the city-state of Sparta cultivated a society built on a ruling caste/tribe that was focused almost exclusively on warfare, brutally governing a much larger subjugated tribe (the helots) that kepts the wheels turning.
  • The Dutch East India Company - A multinational conglomerate that was its own pseudo-government, with an army, currency and trading arm.
  • Whatever really happened on Easter Island, it was bound to be weird.

There are so many grandly weird, and often grim, possibilities for societal and cultural expressions that it boggles my mind that the human psyche can be so variegated. Most of which we will never even know about, as they were never written about - And fantasy is to me like a great vehicle for exploring that. It seems reductive to me to just task fantasy gaming to modern issues and then simply re-enact those with medieval clothes and magic.

Some of those possibilities do involve very little ambiguity. Sure, not all germans in 1944 were evil. But there was no ambiguity about the fact that if you met a nazi soldier on the battlefield, you could shoot him down knowing you had done so for a righteous cause.

So yes, perhaps there is a point also to having orcs as rampaging hordes with few shades of grey. I don't need all my fantasy cultural expressions to tick the "but back home they are just like you and me" box. The question for me is rather - What kind of setting assumption does having rampaging hordes enforce and does that fit the setting? For running a 1e "Savage Frontier" FR campaign, I would say it definitely has a place.

In similar vein, I prefer elves to be distinctly non-human in their psychology. I like the idea that where humans have a morality switch (that can span a wide spectrum) I see elves having an aesthetic switch instead. So yeah, maybe killing is undesirable. Because it is so gory. But that's a fundamentally inhuman approach to explore within the bounds of fantasy. That's how Paul Anderson's elves strike me as operating. 

The times I've run through the "what's it like for the orcs?" scenarios in my head, I tend to end up in a worldview of them being in a somewhat similar place as the neanderthals were when on the verge of being wiped out by the homo sapiens. Pushed to the wilderness by the civilisation of mankind - and there having the numbers and inclination to fight back aggressively. Having a quite involved patron deity hammering the same themes over and over, as the shamanic cheerleader of all tribes, probably does a lot to reinforce the whole mentality.
Spartan councils decided if infants should live or die based on their apparent fitness for the warrior life. Orcs I am sure have even more brutal rituals to weed out whatever exceptions to their cruel life may appear. The net effect is an effectively 'evil' race, whether by cultural upbringing or genetics. I find the cultural upbringing more interesting to explore, but for the people being raided, the difference is presumably negligible.

As for orcs society 'back home', I tend to see it orc settlements as essentially slave-based. But unlike the vikings or spartans, they have no interest in their slaves procreating, or using them as trade, etc. They are to be used up until they die. Hence the regular need for raids.

Comments

  1. Damn, this is the first time I've become aware there is an issue with comments. There is something broken that needs fixing.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree wholeheartedly with this post, especially the Dark Sun example.

    Nothing wrong with attempts to refine a fantasy trope into something more interesting and nuanced, but creation cannot be hemmed by moral bounds. One’s players should be free to confront, transcend, reject or even accept what they’re presented, within the constraints of an uncaring world that pushes back.

    People gathering around a table to fictionalize righting the perceived wrongs of the past makes for poor fantasy and is ultimately nothing but zen activism (i.e. hipocrisy). The same goes for the profoundly sterile exercise of having the DM inject present-day views to sanitize those from the time of printing.

    Utopia is a place best seen from afar; once you actually get to tread it, it becomes something else.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Speaking of having some difficulty contacting a blogger, I had a question about the Into the Unknown bundle of DTRPG that I wanted to ask you directly, but couldn't find a link to do so.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "Malazan: Book of the Fallen" (a very long and amazing fantasy book series and definitely my favourite fantasy book) explore this issue very deeply (for me). There are a lot of traditional races transformed into something else, more sentient, more profound. There are a lot of killing, a lot of gore and a lot of "I cannot keep reeding because I am crying), but there is no pure evil in that book. There are a lot of motivation for every character/race. Maybe it has been written from a Post-modern point of view and now, looking back, many of the fantasy behind looks so naive that it is difficult to me enjoining it again.

    I have just discover your blog and I love it after few readings. Thanks for sharing all these thoughts :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Likewise. I first saw this in B5 Horror on the Hill, where the evil cleric is basically becoming a goblin from hanging out with them, which I quite liked.

    It's a theme that also plays really well with my preference for a Law vs Chaos metaphysical dichotomy, where too much Chaos will begin to physically transform you. Monsters aren't necessarily born. They're made.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Top 6 most viewed posts in the last 12 months

The Difficult-to-Believe Case of Zak Smith's Innocence

Addendum: Why "Roll under" Ability checks really are the best of checks

The 3 Mile Hex - The Natural Unit for Exploration

In Praise of "Black Box" D&D

How Difficulty Class and the D20 engine ruined roleplaying

The Fighter Across All Editions of TSR D&D