Class Work: Bards in AD&D

-

As an adult, my favorite class is the regular fighter, though I did enjoy playing a paladin straight for a campaign's worth.

As a teenager, I did not mirror myself in glory fantasies or related all that well my own masculinity (so fighter wasn't all that for me) and power fantasies were rather fleeting for me (and so Wizards, while cool, were also a fleeting fascination for me). What I really related to was the second edition Bard.

Not because I saw myself as a budding minstrel, but for all the non-entertainment aspects of the class. A jack-of-all-trades, extending even to magic, who seems to adventure, not for glory or power, but simply for the sake of adventure. That was something that resonated a lot with my teenage self.

Reflecting on this today, makes me think on the strange fit the Bard is setting-wise. 

This bard is about to rock your world with his flute and fat shortsword.

I mean, what's the deal with a minstrel that knows magic and a bit of everything? Do all  minstrels learn magic? What makes bards special? Why do they even exist?

Who are these people who wander the world, learning combat, magic, cutpursing, legend lore and many other things, and express their accomplishment through performance?

Setting all my pre-conceptions aside and just thinking on what such a character would be like, my first impression is these people are itinerant bohemian renegades, standing outside established society (and thus, the opposite of the celtic bard in this sense) and become jack-of-trades because they wish to experience and try all things. Adventuring is essentially baked into their mindset.

Would they have their own informal society? I think they would have to. They skillsets are too deep to not have some sort of common association where knowledge and skill is exchanged and taught and help somewhat homogenise what it means to be a Bard.

I am inspired by the vagabond culture and society here in Denmark, also called "country road knights." I am unaware of their existence in other countries, in the form Vagabond society takes in Denmark at least, so I will take some time to describe them:

Vagabonds in Denmark are voluntary homeless wanderers. They have their own system of uniform jackets decorated with various signs and emblems that distinguish them as voluntarily homeless wanderers and typically wander with their belongings in a baby stroller. A lot of them make a small living as knife grinders.

Old school vagabond

They meet around 4-5 times a year at various fairs around the country (several of which they have been granted special privileges from the original landowners centuries back). 

At one of these, they initiate and baptise new vagabonds with their new vagabond name (in beer, which they may not wash out for three days). At another they crown the annual Bum King ("Stodderkonge") and Mooch prince ("Nasseprins") and a few other titles. 

It is also at these fairs the Bum King and Mooch Prince may exercise some internal justice and mandate quarantine for a vagabond who fails to properly meet the vagabond principles of love, honesty and mutual respect that they swear to abide by when baptised as vagabonds.

A few decades ago, there were hundreds. But new membership is declining and there is estimated to only be 50-80 bonafide vagabonds left in Denmark today.

Despite the strong sense of community and camaraderie among vagabonds, they don't tend to travel together much, citing themselves a proverb that "after three days, fish and vagabonds both begin to stink."

Vagabond swag.

I see this as a perfect template for Bards in a fantasy setting, albeit with customs of learning magic and a few tricks along the way embedded. Unlike modern Vagabonds, the drive to "bard" (v.) frequently happens at a young age and it is not uncommon for a wandering bard to pick up an 'apprentice' when passing through town, at least for a little while (at the next fair meeting, these aspiring bards likely will wander with a new bard to continue their 'tutelage' until after a few years, they begin solitary roaming, aka 1st level). Unlike vagabond society, bards will only take in newcomers whom they can tell have the requisite talent to pick up the many skillsets a bard will acquire for their unique lifestyle.

Why are Bards performers then? This is their "in", so to speak. The way they plug into conventional society and ensure a decent welcome where they travel to next. Though perhaps more Goliards than common minstrel. They have perhaps become a collective repository of lore, one of the quirks the society accumulated over generations of shared knowledge exchange at the fairs they meet at. Either way, performance is the side gig, their way of keeping up appearances, their calling card to established society. 

What they really are about is the road, adventure and to experience and master all things possible.



Comments

Post a Comment

Top 6 most viewed posts in the last 12 months

The Difficult-to-Believe Case of Zak Smith's Innocence

-
I honestly did not imagine myself to be writing a piece like this on this blog. But I feel morally obligated to do so, given that I previously wrote a piece based on the firm assumption of his guilt . Yesterday,  Jeff Rients shared a link to an article based on an upcoming research paper  by Dr. Clio Weisman. I'd encourage anyone who has, or has had, some interest in the OSR community and/or held some sort of opinion on the case of Zak Smith, to read it after reading this one. tl;dr - The article is about the utterly bizarre lying, harassing and slandering behaviour that has somehow become prevalent in certain sectors of the Rennaisance-Formerly-Known-as-OSR. And Zak Smith sat at the heart of it, as its principal recipient. Dr. Weisman thus chose him as her case study.  Long story short, Dr. Weisman lays out a meticulous and researched case that shows Smith to be targeted by OSR trolls for many years with a series of slanderous harassment campaigns, and also to be th...
Read more

The 3 Mile Hex - The Natural Unit for Exploration

-
Image
There will be interludes between the AD&D Appraisal series, to keep my own writing motivation going. I was going to do a 3-mile hex post outlining the virtues of it, but turns out Silverarm did that already and stole all my points  (even down to the "Outdoor Survival also uses 3 miles") and added more points I wasn't aware of myself. So go read that excellent piece and come back here. What I instead want to talk about is how the 3 mile hex is a very close fit to our natural sense of distance and visualisation and how the that makes the 3-mile hex the perfect blend between immersion and usable game artifact and how to actually bring that into your game.  Minaria hexmap. Scale: 1 hex = 50 miles. Not what we're going for here. A while back, Noisms contemplated the difficulty of creating a sense of wonder in journeys . The difficulty with journeys in RPGs is the scale of it. It becomes too big, and thus too abstract, to visualize, to immerse oneself into.  I tried, un...
Read more

In Praise of "Black Box" D&D

-
Image
when it comes to non-Advanced D&D, The internet, and in particular the OSR blogosphere, has deserved praise galore for the B/X sets for D&D. And whilst not quite as enthusiastic, the Mentzer editions for those Basic and Expert sets also get plenty of praise for its art and way of introducing the game. The Holmes set also has its fair of passionate fans. And of course the original brown booklets themselves. Of newer releases, the Rules Cyclopedia also has a large following of fans. One release that hardly ever gets a mention is the 1991 'black box', by Timothy B. Brown and Troy Denning. Actually, the Rules Cyclopedia was published as a sort of companion to this set. Together  they represents the fifth and final edition of non-advanced D&D. "The New Easy to Master Dungeons & Dragons Game" also labelled "Classic Dungeons & Dragons" It's short, 64 page booklet, so much the same as its predecessors, comes with a simple dungeon m...
Read more

Addendum: Why "Roll under" Ability checks really are the best of checks

-
Image
My recent meditations on roll under ability checks and rant against the D20 unified mechanic has generated a bit of commentary and further clarified my own thinking on the matter. This post is an addendum to my  Using Ability Checks in B/X  article, seeking to further explicate why the "Roll Under" ability check truly is the best of ability checks. Earlier today, during my delvings into the blogosphere, I came across this box from  Quarrel & Fable , a Fighting Fantasy spinoff: First thing that struck me was how similar it was to my proposed resolution for Ability Checks . And secondly, it combined those thoughts with my memories of the old Fighting Fantasy  [FF] gamebooks and set my mind spinning into that cross section and how much I always liked the elegant simplicity of the FF mechanic. The best part about doing a post involving Fighting Fantasy is the chance to showcase some of the brilliant art in the gamebooks Now, I've given reasons already in prev...
Read more

How Difficulty Class and the D20 engine ruined roleplaying

-
Image
It seemed revolutionary at the time. 3e came out and made a unified mechanic. Roll 1d20 against a target number to see if you succeed. In combat, AC is the target number. For everything else, it's a Difficulty Class [DC]. That's it.  Some of those DCs are calculated as a function of level, opposing ability score etc. But what we also got from this system was a way of ad hoc determining the difficulty of something and then simply saying "roll against that target number to succeed".  In its core form, this is wonderfully simple and intuitive. All you need to internalise is the size of the numbers on a d20 in relation to overall difficulty and then you can resolve basically anything with it. The part about size of numbers has proven to be a bit of an achilles heel for d20 over the years, but that is a different point I will address further below. No, the real point here is that there's an unintended side effect to DCs as a unified mechanic. There are other downsides ...
Read more

The Fighter Across All Editions of TSR D&D

-
Image
Ok, it's time to get back to elf-games. And why not look at the class that is simultaneously the most beloved and under-appreciated class in the history of D&D? I was going to include assessments of WotC fighters too, but honestly, they end up being so different, and embedded into different systems, that it's like comparing apples and oranges. I would still like to look at the 3e fighter, as that has at least a little continuity with TSR D&D but I think that's for a different post on why feats aren't so bad after all and have a place in all versions of D&D... Moving ON , let's dig in: OD&D : Fighting-Men, as they are called. They get d6 hit die like everyone else, but they start at HD 1+1 and gain more HD as they level than clerics or magic-users (at level 10, the fighter has 10+1, cleric 7+2 and and magic-user 7). They have no armor or weapon restrictions. For weapons, this only matters in regards to which weapons are typically magical (swords, figh...
Read more